Drew Ink The year

Superfamily

A family drawn across categories rather than only weights, so a serif, a sans and often a slab share one skeleton, one set of proportions and one set of metrics.

Superfamily: a letter in the house face with the superfamily marked in vermilion.
Superfamily, drawn, Drew Ink. Drawn 2026-09-29.

Near it

Variable fontOptical size

What it is made of

what it isone design carried across classes - a serif, a sans, a slab - sharing metrics so the three can be swapped in a line without anything moving
measured on this shelf, and the first two versions of this row measured the wrong thingthe 23 families are drawn from ONE skeleton on one grid, box 24, cap [4, 20], baseline 20; fifteen keep its x-height and eight move it structurally (Display, Engrave, Terrace, Press, Poster, Gazette, Compact and Micro). The vertical half of a superfamily is there for the fifteen and deliberately not for the eightread from the family engine's own settings, 2026-09-24. This row has been wrong twice: first it said 23 distinct metric sets, which was the stroke landing wherever it landed rather than the drawing; then it said all 23 share one grid, read from face.json design blocks that are copied from the base and do not record the eight that move the x-height
and on the ink it comes as close as the drawing sayseight families share a cap of 700 and an x of 525 on the ink: Condensed, Grotesk, Mono, Monoline, Outline, Slab, Square and Unicase, and no two of the eight share their widthsmeasured with fontTools on the fixed shelf, 2026-09-24. Until then the shared pair was cap 757 and x 582, the whole face standing 57 units under its baseline; the baseline fix moved the eight together and they still agree
what is genuinely not sharedthe advance widthsa superfamily needs the horizontal half too, and no two families here share their A-to-Z advances. That is the real remaining distance and it is much shorter than eight different cap heights made it look. Re-checked on the fixed shelf 2026-09-24: no two of the 23 share their A-to-Z advances

Where it came from

The idea is usually credited to Adrian Frutiger's system thinking, and the modern examples date from the 1990s onward.

Done well